Skip to main content
Don't Fear of Surgery Logo

資料來源

  1. Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, Bichell DP, Rosborough DM, Sears SP, et al.
    Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched comparison. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;3(3):227–232.
    Available from: https://www.annalscts.com/article/view/5084/6300
  2. Khalid U, Mohyud Din Chaudhary MA, Khan S, Imran S, Fiaz M, Chaudhary MA, et al.
    Comparison of Full Sternotomy and Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41963.
    Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230795/
  3. Chikwe J, Goldstone AB, Bagiella E, Adams DH, Anyanwu AC.
    Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in the United States: an analysis of trends and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(7):860–865.
  4. Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li H, Xu H, Zhang R.
    Comparison of clinical outcomes between minimally invasive and conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;11:1437524.
    Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1437524/full
  5. Heart Valve Society.
    Structural and mechanical durability comparison of bovine vs porcine pericardial tissues. Presented at Heart Valve Society Annual Meeting. 2022.
    Available from: https://heartvalvesociety.org/meeting/program/2022/33.cgi
  6. Zhu C, Wu W, Ma J, Li L, Fan Y, Zhang Y.
    Fluid–structure interaction simulation of porcine and bovine aortic valves in vitro: A comparative study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;115:104270.
    Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104270
  7. Hosseini M, Chen J, Dasi LP.
    Comparison of hemodynamic performance in surgical bovine and porcine bioprosthetic aortic valves using in vitro experiments. J Clin Med. 2023;14(10):3499.
    Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103499
  8. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, et al.
    2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021;77(4):e25-e197.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018
  9. Ali AM, Qureshi AM, Patel AM, et al.
    Comparison of dry vs wet tissue bioprosthetic valves in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
    Front Mech Eng. 2022;8:764034. 
  10. Schoen FJ, Levy RJ.
    Tissue heart valves: Current challenges and future research perspectives. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020;108(9):1951–1971.
    Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36971
  11. Schoen FJ, Levy RJ.
    Issue heart valves: Current challenges and future research perspectives.
    Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2020;108(9):1951–1971.
    Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36971